statistical software medcalc for windows version 18.6.0.0 (MedCalc Software Ltd)
90
Structured Review
MedCalc Software Ltd
statistical software medcalc for windows version 18.6.0.0
Statistical Software Medcalc For Windows Version 18.6.0.0, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/for+windows+version+18%2E6%2E0%2E0/medcalc+9+0+1/10__1097_slash_rct__0000000000001238-50-5-7
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Statistical Software Medcalc For Windows Version 18.6.0.0, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/for+windows+version+18%2E6%2E0%2E0/medcalc+9+0+1/10__1097_slash_rct__0000000000001238-50-5-7
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
statistical software medcalc for windows version 18.6.0.0 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: A Novel Algorithm to Differentiate Between Multiple Primary Lung Cancers and Intrapulmonary Metastasis in Multiple Lung Cancers With Multiple Pulmonary Sites of Involvement. Article Snippet: Statistical analysis Statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc for Article Title: Coronary artery calcium severity grading on non-ECG-gated low-dose chest computed tomography: a multiple-observer study in a nationwide lung cancer screening registry. Article Snippet: Objectives To identify the optimal method for evaluation of coronary artery calcium (CAC) severity on non-electrocardiogramgated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) in a nationwide lung cancer screening registry.. Methods A total of 256 subjects were retrospectively enrolled from participants of the Korean Lung Cancer Screening (KLUCAS) project (an LDCT lung cancer screening registry for high-risk individuals).. Four board-certified cardiothoracic radiologists independently assessed CAC severity using four different scoring methods (visual assessment, artery-based grading, segment-involvement grading, and segment-based grading) and classified severity for each case using all four methods as none, mild, moderate, or severe. |